The Unseen Hazards of Technologically Enhanced Liturgy

We talk a lot about the hidden dangers in our food brought about by the technologisation of the food chain. But how much attention do we give to similarly hidden dangers in our consuming of the Real Food in the Divine Liturgy?
In a post on the Patheos religious blogging hub, Deacon Greg Kandra spoke of the increasingly popular phenomenon of replacing hymnals with projected slides on a wall. While this could be seen to be a cost-saving measure (and indeed there are hymnals with songs so vomitous they are not worth the paper on which they are printed), Kandra alerts us to a number of sociological side effects of this micropractice in the liturgy. 
At one level, the use of projectors flattens out social space, such that all congregants, regardless of stature or ability or disposition, are made to sing (sometimes with accompanying organ-nazi barking orders at you). This is juxtaposed by Kandra against the use of hymnals, which allow for the complexities within the Body of Christ. It is more amenable to accommodating, for instance, the person who for reasons only he would know does not want to sing but reflect silently. It would also be more accommodating to the short or stiff necked.
At another level, the physical conformity that the use of projectors calls for paradoxically splinters the social body. The Church is made to resemble a sociological bicycle wheel with a central hub (the screen) and spokes (the congregants), with little interaction within the latter. This is juxtaposed to the use of hymnals that allows for such interaction within the social body of the congregation via the sharing of books in situations of scarcity. 
Kandra’s article, in its identification of the effects of social flattening and splintering brought about by the technologisation of our culture, fleshes out a brief reflection in an earlier post concerning technology and its capacity to  parody the sacramental economy.

One thought on “The Unseen Hazards of Technologically Enhanced Liturgy

  1. I went to a beautiful Penticost liturgy today and I have to say the idea of jazzing litury up and technologically anhancing it all too easily reduces it to entertainment. This, as you and teh Patheos guy point out, is certainly dangerous if we see no danger in it. On Ptheos – there is a fabulous discussion going on at 'Faith and Theology' abouth whether this sort of paid blogging is a compromise or not. Very interestging discussion.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s